Tim Malone said this:
I declare unto you, in all words of
soberness, in words revealed unto me by the Lord, that He has sent a
prophet to us within the last few years from outside the hierarchy of
the Church, with a mission to teach us, to warn us, and to lead us to
the Lord. I have spent hundreds of hours studying his published
words. I have listened to his recorded teachings over this past year
and have found truth in what he has shared. I have sat in his
presence recently to test his spirit. I found no fault and have had
my witness reaffirmed.
I declare unto you this prophet is
acting as an Elias, or a John the Baptist, with the mission to
prepare us to receive the Lord. More importantly, he is as Moses in
striving to show us the way to the Lord, that we may enter into His
presence in this life, to be prepared to be caught up to meet the
inhabitants of the City of Enoch at the coming of the Lord. That
event will be accompanied by great destructions. This is well known.
Not as well-known is just how soon those destructions will begin to
be poured out upon us.
And he apparently got a tremendous
amount of flack for it.
I am lucky - or blessed - or something.
Hardly anyone knows of my blog. Even at its most active, I don't have
much traffic in comparison with Tim, Rock, and others whose blogs I
read with interest.
I have moved, there is confusion about
what ward I belong in, so I have decided to go to whatever ward is
closest to walk to.
In other words, they can't get me
because I'm a nobody (so no one will complain) and am in no ward. And
I have been wondering: If I post what I really think will there be
any consequences? I doubt it. I've posted what I've thought before
with no repercussions.
So I am going to do an experiment, to
prove to myself that I really am a nothing and a nobody (my family
and friends, with the exception of one similar-minded friend, don't
read this - have probably forgotten this blog even exists, if they
knew it in the first place). I am going to write plainly and freely.
Tim's comments above are spot on. He
said it much better than I could have.
God's voice is once again heard among
us after a silence created after the death of Joseph Smith (not that
many listened to what he was really trying to get at while he was
alive - and he let them go their merry ways, creating a church after
the desires of their own hearts).
I do not comprehend how anyone can fail
to recognize the voice of the Master in the words He speaks through
his latest servant. How can it fail to resonate? How can it not
be familiar? As familiar as one's own parent?
Some say that they don't “feel good”
when the servant speaks. The Spirit doesn't make you “feel good,”
especially if you are in a deep sleep, a drunken stupor. The Spirit
gives you information. What emotions come up as a result of the
information is not under the Spirit's jurisdiction.
Some rage on about the messenger -
either defending him or attempting to splice, dice, or silence him.
They are offended at the message the Lord told him to deliver, so
they are going to shoot the messenger. Some might even be delighted
at the message so they praise the messenger.
So Denver is a true prophet of God. You
know, the kind that actually sees God and tells people what God told
him to say. Great. End of subject.
Let's continue on to the message,
without which we would be damned because we are too dense to figure
it out ourselves through our own prayers and study. And, more and
more, we study general conference talks instead of the Book of
Mormon.
Let's digress to the Book of Mormon.
I'd recommend the 1830 version because, you see, I was taught in more
Sunday School classes than I can count (when I was a child we had
Sunday School on Sunday and Primary was after school) that Joseph
Smith translated the book so incredibly. He picked up where he left
off each time he began again. Nothing was crossed out. He made no
mistakes. So, if that's true, then the best version is the 1830
version.
Except. It was one long run-on
sentence. So, go
here to download a version without punctuation
(sorry - it was too time-prohibitive to go through and remove/replace
all of the capital letters). Let the
Spirit tell you what the
book
really says.
The Book of
Commandments had revelations given to and through Joseph Smith
(though I understand that some in either that book or the Doctrine
and Covenants - or both - may have come through someone else, even
though Joseph is credited with them). Good book to read.
If you read the
Doctrine and Covenants, I would recommend the first edition. It
contains the Lectures on Faith. Joseph spent serious effort editing
those to get them right. He let a committee deal with the “covenants”
section of the book. Guess what? They did some “free-lancing” -
They embellished parts, made them sound more like what they thought
God would say. Don't believe me? Read the Book of Commandments, then
read the same revelations as written in the first edition of the
Doctrine and Covenants.
When I was a child,
I was taught in church that “we know more than the pioneers did.”
We knew more than Joseph did. You see, the church had evolved and we
understood a whole lot more. I continued being taught that as I grew
up. And I believed it.
When I
read in the Lectures on Faith (when I was around 18 or 20 years old)
that there were only two
persons in the Godhead and that the Holy Spirit wasn't even a person,
I believed the footnote that explained that Joseph hadn't figured it
out yet. Yet a part of me wondered how he could have gotten it wrong,
seeing as he had seen God and all that.
Well,
it was only recently that I saw something clearly: We
are the ones who haven't figured it out. No president of the church
has had the visions Joseph had. The few we believe had visions of
Jesus were never delivered over the pulpit, thus are suspect. And the
recent deliveries (from
apostles) have been couched
in poetic phrases, never coming right out and plainly saying, “I
know Jesus lives, because I have seen Him. I have touched Him. I have
talked to Him. He wants me to tell you …” That smacks of
deception to me. That smacks of lies to me. Intentionally.
A
“special witness” of Christ is one who is a witness of His
suffering in Gethsemane, crucifixion, death, and resurrection - most
likely in vision (definitely so today). It is not
a fancy title, and most certainly is not a fancy title meaning, “I
get to boss you around. I get to tell you how to dress, how to
decorate your bodies, what you can say and to whom. I
get to demand your respect and veneration.
You are to honor and obey me
above all and, most especially, if the Holy Ghost tells you something
- or the scriptures do - and it goes against my opinions or sermon or
the latest policy, I
take precedence over scriptures and your Holy Ghost. Follow me and
you will get to heaven. Obey my voice and it is impossible for you to
be led astray.”
Which
brings me to the idea of prophets, because
we consider our “special witnesses” to all be prophets. Look in
the scriptures. The Book of Mormon is the “most correct book”
according to Joseph Smith (note that he did not say it was completely
correct. There could be errors in it), and the book says that the
Bible is a huge stumbling block, so it would be safest to search the
pages of the Book of Mormon.
I want you to look
in that book and find me one prophet of God – just one – who
says, “Follow me!” Find one who says, “I
cannot lead you astray. It isn't in the program. It isn't possible
for me to say anything false or contrary to the will of God.”
And I want you to
look in that book and find how many prophets point to Christ and say,
“Follow Christ.”
And I want you to
look in that book and find out how many prophets heap laud and honor
upon their listeners for being so awesome. Ditto for any, “To my
grandchildren, who are so dear and precious to my heart, and while
we're at it, here is a video or some photograph(s) to boost my pride
in my progeny.”
I want
you to look in that book and find where it says that it is okay to
practice polygamy because David and Solomon did it. (Heck,
look at D&C 132 if you want, which I believe to have been
altered by - maybe even created by - Joseph's
secretary, William Clayton, who was conveniently working for Brigham
Young when BY felt the need to find something of Joseph's to “prove”
that Joseph was lying every time he said he didn't have more than one
wife, as in a sexual partner, which is what it seems to mean to
everyone, anyway. It points out that Isaac practiced
polygamy. Oops. Bit of a boo boo, WC. Strange that BY and those who
followed him in the presidency all said and believed the same thing
about polygamy: it was to have lots and lots of children. If that is
what Joseph taught them, where are the lots and lots of children
Joseph was supposed to have had?)
I want you to consider that God was, just maybe, talking about
spiritual seed when He said, “raise up seed to me.” Just maybe.
And I
want it to be known that my greatest desire is for all
to escape the chains of hell. I desire spiritual darkness to have no
power over anyone who has even the tiniest bit of desire to escape
it. I desire all who follow men or women to wake up and follow the
one Man who is the
only one worthy of following, the only one worthy of emulation.
I do
not hate the religion I was born into. I
appreciate that it gave me the Book of Mormon. I appreciate that it
gave me baptism. I appreciate the truths that it did teach me (I am
still in the process of separating the truth from the error).
I do not look at my ancestors with distaste or disdain (I am
certainly no better than they, and
am probably worse). What I do
see in us today
is a blindness. I see a belief that we are somehow smarter and more
learned than those in the past. I see that we believe if we follow
men, fallible humans, then we will be saved. No need for the Book of
Mormon. Conference talks suffice.
I see
true messengers from God despised, rejected, reviled,
cast out, mocked, derided, accused of being a devil or having a devil
or following a devil. I am not concerned about the messengers. They
are in God's hands. He will do with them what He will. My concern is
for those who despise the messengers. My concern is for the physical
and spiritual destruction of those who profess to know and have the
truth, yet fight against God. My
prayers are intense for them, as well as for those who have
recognized the need to follow only Christ and are willing to
sacrifice all things to follow Him. Many of the latter group receive
persecution in their own homes or among their friends and peers, or
are sorely tempted to do something that would ruin what they are
desiring to acquire and accomplish.
Yet,
it must be so. Life must be.
We must be presented with choices. We must allow those who oppose to
oppose. We must allow those who insist upon fear to have that fear.
And it must be that there are those who think I am “apostate”
even though I am actually a
heretic, and who
think I have joined the
forces of
darkness (that is if they
ever notice what I believe).
And, once we have
been taught from on high, I expect it is our responsibility to teach
what we have learned. But only if moved upon by the Holy Ghost or
directed to do so by our Lord.
I want you (anyone
who happens to read this) to know that I am a bumbling fool. Heaven
has taken notice of me on occasion, just as it probably has for you
(whether you recognize it as such or not). Heaven has bestowed
blessings on me. Heaven has given me gifts. I suspect it has done the
same for you.
We should be in a
fight against darkness, not against those who do not toe the line of
appropriate Brethren-worship (adoration, fidelity, whatever you are
pleased to call it). We have a common enemy and it is not “the
Brethren” nor is it true messengers. The common enemy seeks to
destroy our souls and will use all it can to sink us.
The
way to combat darkness is to turn and face the Light. We need no
“parlor tricks”. We need not concentrate on darkness, nor school
ourselves in the ranks of devils nor their tools. We need only to
face Christ with full purpose of heart, with true humility, and with
an intense desire to know only that which is true no matter how close
to or far from our paradigms
it may be (or from that which
tickles our fancy).
Just to be plain:
True messengers are not here to usurp control over the LDS church,
nor to create another institution/corporation or church. They are no
threat to the First Presidency's authority over the Church, though
they might be a threat to the First Presidency's income, pride, and
power simply by virtue of teaching truth - and teaching what a true
messenger is and is not.
