It is very frustrating, to be sure. I don't think any document is or will be without defects.
I think Adrian means well.
What
I think is happening is that dark spirits (devils) are among us galore,
and they are doing everything they can to prevent us from agreeing on
this, even using people's good intentions. If they can keep us from
coming together on this until it is too late, and God rejects us, they
will have won.
The same
pattern has played out over and over again in regards to the Governing Principles, Guiding Principles, and now Guide and Standard. Mutual agreement, then
someone (or several someones) come along and either says, I didn't
really agree, or they say, I never agreed - and they want to do it a
different way, then everything is in an uproar again.
I think Jeff is trying to be agreeable, noncontentious, willing to do anything to try to get people to agree on something. I think that is why he has teamed up with Adrian. I think he is willing to do almost anything if it's possible that we will actually agree.
The
reason I support going with the 91% vote we had is because we need to have a
stopping point, and that 91% is the most agreement we've had. I doubt it will be much better (I could be wrong; I hope I'm wrong).
We
also seem to be woefully lacking in trust in God. He can fix it if we
ask Him to. In regards to that, though, there are those who don't want
to involve Denver at all, not even to ask him to take a finished product
to the Lord, thinking that will violate the Lord's commandment to
Denver to not participate. They want to have a random generator choose
who should take the finished product to the Lord. I can see all hell
breaking loose with that if the person is a nobody like Jeff was.
Before
I got your email, I was pouring out my soul to God, begging him to step
in and do something for the sake of those of us who are willing to be
united. No document will be perfect. The test we failed 3 times, in my
opinion, is not "not getting the document right," but in rising up to
fight and contend in our pride or fear wanting "my" idea put forth.
I
get being afraid of potential abuse of a document. I get thinking that
our ideas for something "better" will work. I get being afraid to ask
Denver to present our finished (91%) document to the Lord for approval,
rejection, or correction. But I think, at some point, our time will run
out because this cycle we've been going through for 6 months can
realistically continue for decades or even centuries, but I don't think God is giving us
decades, let alone a century or two. Nauvoo got 3 1/2 years if I'm remembering correctly, to build a temple. I doubt he
is giving us that long for the baby step of agreeing on a little
document that he can then approve of or correct.
I agree. The problem is not in the document - it is in the hearts. Envying (why is so and so involved and not me, who is so and so and why would God have talked to him - he is not important), Strife (this is not according to my preference or viewpoints, I will not accept it unless it is done in my way) and Contention (I will contend against what has been done and present a whole new solution).
ReplyDeleteI hope and pray unity can still come through this. If we all are willing to drop envying, conflict, and strife I think it is possible.
I find this statement in the opening remarks at the conference interesting in relation to all of this:
"The lofty branches have always destroyed equality to prevent Zion."
I think you are spot on. And that last paragraph is chilling.
DeleteI continue to cry out to the Lord to fix it, if he can, for the sakes of those who are and have been willing to accept the previous documents.